"The lack of complete technology transfer and local production means India would rely heavily on the US for spares and maintenance, potentially compromising operational readiness during conflicts. Furthermore, it restricts India's ability to develop indigenous capabilities and compromises long-term self-reliance," Linganna stressed.
"These dependencies and restrictions might make it more of an Achilles' heel than a security guarantor," Linganna underscored.
It is worth noting that Rosoboronexport, Russia's state arms exporter is of the view that the production of Su-57 can begin in India as soon as this year.
"Rosoboronexport, together with United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), proposes to localise FGFA aircraft in India. This production of the FGFA at the HAL plant might take place as early as 2025. It can be provided this year itself," a company official said during the AERO India show last week.
"India's decision should weigh the short-term gains of the F-35 against the long-term strategic independence offered by the AMCA program, considering potential dependencies and the need for a robust, self-reliant defence ecosystem," Linganna concluded.
"The IAF should form a committee to evaluate the two aircraft and the deals being offered to India because the country's requirements are completely different. After all, India cannot sit idle when two of its chief adversaries are on the verge of inducting stealth fighters in large numbers in their Air Forces," Pandey emphasised.