Is there a soft Hindu power, then? IN 1998, when Atal Bihari Vajpayee became PM of India, with Lal Krishna Advani as his N°2 and Murli Manohar Joshi as N°3, one thought that Hindu power had come to the fore and that, as many had dreamt, a Hindu Rashtra, a Hindu kingdom will be again established in South Asia, 500 years after the bloody demise of the last great Hindu empire, that of Vijaynagar (or Hampi). But Mr Vajpayee preferred soft power, although he ordered India’s second nuclear explosion, in Pokharan, Rajasthan. Ultimately, his party, the BJP, was beaten in 2004 and the Congress came back for 10 years. In 2014, another Hindu firebrand, Narendra Modi, was elected as PM on a nationalist wave. One expected then a harder Hindu power, than the one practiced by Mr Vajpayee, as Mr Modi
never minced his words while campaigning. But the new PM also embraced soft Hindu power, reaching out to his enemies and keeping quiet whenever Hindus were murdered, like in West Bengal. He did however, at the beginning of his terms, fulfill some of the Hindu demands, such as the building of the Ayodhya temple, to replace the ancient one, that had been razed by Mogol invader Babur (who built a mosque over it). He also
repealed Article 370, which forbade any Indian to settle in Kashmir (but allowed Kashmiri Muslims to settle anywhere India, where they have cornered today the Souvenir market).